<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Alex Slover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexslover.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexslover.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I&#8217;m ditching Facebook by David Miller</title>
		<link>http://alexslover.com/2010/09/06/why-im-ditching-facebook/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexslover.com/?p=211#comment-60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that you have to bullet-point your reasoning is a true testament to how powerful Facebook has become in our everyday lives.  I tend to use it to shoot off statuses as well, but I&#039;ve had the opposite reaction to Twitter: it seems too bare-bones and doesn&#039;t feel like as much of a true social &quot;hub,&quot; if you will.  To be fair, the amount of people on Twitter that I&#039;m following or being followed by is markedly smaller than you, and my account has fallen into an kind of internet purgatory where I can&#039;t decide whether I really need another mouth to feed.  I&#039;ll still be following Sloverlord there anyway.

And yes, I did find this blog through Facebook.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that you have to bullet-point your reasoning is a true testament to how powerful Facebook has become in our everyday lives.  I tend to use it to shoot off statuses as well, but I&#8217;ve had the opposite reaction to Twitter: it seems too bare-bones and doesn&#8217;t feel like as much of a true social &#8220;hub,&#8221; if you will.  To be fair, the amount of people on Twitter that I&#8217;m following or being followed by is markedly smaller than you, and my account has fallen into an kind of internet purgatory where I can&#8217;t decide whether I really need another mouth to feed.  I&#8217;ll still be following Sloverlord there anyway.</p>
<p>And yes, I did find this blog through Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who&#8217;s going to buy Palm? by Alex</title>
		<link>http://alexslover.com/2010/04/12/whos-going-to-buy-palm/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexslover.com/?p=187#comment-18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HTC hasn&#039;t abandoned Windows Mobile, but they seem to be focusing more of their efforts on Android. Of course, that&#039;s only until Windows Phone 7 comes out, because WinMo at the moment is such a mess. The story has actually updated a little: the CEO of HTC said that they have not ruled out developing their own operating system or acquiring Palm, but he said there are some &quot;variables&quot; he wants to check first. Interpret that how you will, but it&#039;s not a &#039;no&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HTC hasn&#8217;t abandoned Windows Mobile, but they seem to be focusing more of their efforts on Android. Of course, that&#8217;s only until Windows Phone 7 comes out, because WinMo at the moment is such a mess. The story has actually updated a little: the CEO of HTC said that they have not ruled out developing their own operating system or acquiring Palm, but he said there are some &#8220;variables&#8221; he wants to check first. Interpret that how you will, but it&#8217;s not a &#8216;no&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who&#8217;s going to buy Palm? by B. Tan</title>
		<link>http://alexslover.com/2010/04/12/whos-going-to-buy-palm/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B. Tan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexslover.com/?p=187#comment-14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d love to see webOS on some new hardware and HTC seems like a prime candidate.  I wouldn&#039;t say HTC has abandoned Windows Mobile since I think I read they are planning a Windows Phone 7 device.  Add in webOS to the mix and they&#039;ve covered all the major smartphone OS bases.

This would really make HTC a powerhouse against players like Apple and RIM.  I think RIM is the one who really needs to step their game up now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see webOS on some new hardware and HTC seems like a prime candidate.  I wouldn&#8217;t say HTC has abandoned Windows Mobile since I think I read they are planning a Windows Phone 7 device.  Add in webOS to the mix and they&#8217;ve covered all the major smartphone OS bases.</p>
<p>This would really make HTC a powerhouse against players like Apple and RIM.  I think RIM is the one who really needs to step their game up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Initial iPad reviews are positive by Mikhail P. Schalk</title>
		<link>http://alexslover.com/2010/04/01/initial-ipad-reviews-are-positive/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikhail P. Schalk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexslover.com/?p=140#comment-12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://chapter-56.blogspot.com/2010/04/ipad-finally-portable-cintiq.html
This intrigues me a little. How much is it? (Though I think I&#039;d still much rather have a traditional convertible Tablet from Gateway or HP... One that is as light and thin as the iPad would be cool though.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://chapter-56.blogspot.com/2010/04/ipad-finally-portable-cintiq.html" rel="nofollow">http://chapter-56.blogspot.com/2010/04/ipad-finally-portable-cintiq.html</a><br />
This intrigues me a little. How much is it? (Though I think I&#8217;d still much rather have a traditional convertible Tablet from Gateway or HP&#8230; One that is as light and thin as the iPad would be cool though.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why you should give Stargate Universe another chance by Mikhail P. Schalk</title>
		<link>http://alexslover.com/2010/04/10/why-you-should-give-stargate-universe-another-chance/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikhail P. Schalk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexslover.com/?p=177#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First off, you should consider publishing some of this stuff on AssociatedContent. They might even pay you upfront for it. This is exactly the kind of stuff they like. You don&#039;t have to give them any rights or anything either you can still publish it here and make money from it there as well. Sweet deal.

Anyways let&#039;s see... I already enjoy Stargate Universe quite a bit so I don&#039;t need to give it another chance ;) but I&#039;ll give you some of my thoughts on the matter: I agree that the character drama was a bit much in the first half of the season. I love character drama... but only when it&#039;s relevant to the plot... and... it was only really relevant about half the time. 
I tend to like the episodes where they&#039;re somehow facing the unknown or some kind of ontological mystery of some kind... the midseason premiere was a great example of what I mean and I think there should be more episodes like that.
I also want those stones to die. I don&#039;t care what&#039;s going on on Earth I&#039;d much rather they be completly lost and on their own out in the universe I think that&#039;s the only thing I really really want to change about the show.
I&#039;m also getting a little tired of the use of the ship as a microcosm for society... I think thematically that&#039;s been done to death in other series and so far they haven&#039;t provided anything really original to the table. That&#039;s probably the thing that makes it most like Battlestar Galactica too. I&#039;m hoping that bundle of themes will be resolved soon so we can move ahead with more awesome exploration/ontological mystery type plot arcs.
I like the aliens. They were pretty cool and original compared to most of the cheesier alien species in the other Stargate series, but I&#039;m not sure just having them as &quot;The enemy of Stargate Universe&quot; would be the best direction to go... I&#039;m just hoping they bring something new and refreshing to the table compared with earlier series and don&#039;t just get into another war with a random evil alien species just for the heck of defending Earth.

I love Dr. Rush. He&#039;s probably the main reason I watch so religiously. He&#039;s definitely got some secrets up his sleeve. My worry, now that he&#039;s been having some very direct confrontations with the Colonel in the last couple episodes is that they might somehow resolve the Dr. Rush mysteries and while that would be really interesting to see... I&#039;m not sure how they would retain my interest too much in the show if they resolve all the Dr. Rushisms... they&#039;re also getting dangerously close to having a &quot;Final Confrontation&quot; betwee Rush and the Colonel... Technically they&#039;re have been several already but obviously all were resolved without eliminating any of the tension... again the worry is that if they keep having confrontations without end it&#039;s just gonna get old fast (although it might create a bit of humorous monotony which could play in the show&#039;s favor), or if they do resolve it for good, what&#039;s going to keep the tensions high afterwards?
This is a dilemma that most television shows have to face at some point between they&#039;re 2 most rivaling characters... and it usually either breaks or makes the show... that is, unless something bigger, better, and more interesting comes along... which we can usually trust Stargate to provide.
As a sub-note, Dr. Rush is seriously starting to look like a pathetic push over. He needs some real payback on the Colonel to even the score I think. If he&#039;s really smart though he&#039;s probably waiting for an opportunity where people will see it as a justified act.

And yes, I did see Daniel Jackson in the trailer and I&#039;m quite excited about that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, you should consider publishing some of this stuff on AssociatedContent. They might even pay you upfront for it. This is exactly the kind of stuff they like. You don&#8217;t have to give them any rights or anything either you can still publish it here and make money from it there as well. Sweet deal.</p>
<p>Anyways let&#8217;s see&#8230; I already enjoy Stargate Universe quite a bit so I don&#8217;t need to give it another chance <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  but I&#8217;ll give you some of my thoughts on the matter: I agree that the character drama was a bit much in the first half of the season. I love character drama&#8230; but only when it&#8217;s relevant to the plot&#8230; and&#8230; it was only really relevant about half the time.<br />
I tend to like the episodes where they&#8217;re somehow facing the unknown or some kind of ontological mystery of some kind&#8230; the midseason premiere was a great example of what I mean and I think there should be more episodes like that.<br />
I also want those stones to die. I don&#8217;t care what&#8217;s going on on Earth I&#8217;d much rather they be completly lost and on their own out in the universe I think that&#8217;s the only thing I really really want to change about the show.<br />
I&#8217;m also getting a little tired of the use of the ship as a microcosm for society&#8230; I think thematically that&#8217;s been done to death in other series and so far they haven&#8217;t provided anything really original to the table. That&#8217;s probably the thing that makes it most like Battlestar Galactica too. I&#8217;m hoping that bundle of themes will be resolved soon so we can move ahead with more awesome exploration/ontological mystery type plot arcs.<br />
I like the aliens. They were pretty cool and original compared to most of the cheesier alien species in the other Stargate series, but I&#8217;m not sure just having them as &#8220;The enemy of Stargate Universe&#8221; would be the best direction to go&#8230; I&#8217;m just hoping they bring something new and refreshing to the table compared with earlier series and don&#8217;t just get into another war with a random evil alien species just for the heck of defending Earth.</p>
<p>I love Dr. Rush. He&#8217;s probably the main reason I watch so religiously. He&#8217;s definitely got some secrets up his sleeve. My worry, now that he&#8217;s been having some very direct confrontations with the Colonel in the last couple episodes is that they might somehow resolve the Dr. Rush mysteries and while that would be really interesting to see&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure how they would retain my interest too much in the show if they resolve all the Dr. Rushisms&#8230; they&#8217;re also getting dangerously close to having a &#8220;Final Confrontation&#8221; betwee Rush and the Colonel&#8230; Technically they&#8217;re have been several already but obviously all were resolved without eliminating any of the tension&#8230; again the worry is that if they keep having confrontations without end it&#8217;s just gonna get old fast (although it might create a bit of humorous monotony which could play in the show&#8217;s favor), or if they do resolve it for good, what&#8217;s going to keep the tensions high afterwards?<br />
This is a dilemma that most television shows have to face at some point between they&#8217;re 2 most rivaling characters&#8230; and it usually either breaks or makes the show&#8230; that is, unless something bigger, better, and more interesting comes along&#8230; which we can usually trust Stargate to provide.<br />
As a sub-note, Dr. Rush is seriously starting to look like a pathetic push over. He needs some real payback on the Colonel to even the score I think. If he&#8217;s really smart though he&#8217;s probably waiting for an opportunity where people will see it as a justified act.</p>
<p>And yes, I did see Daniel Jackson in the trailer and I&#8217;m quite excited about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LHC to start colliding at 7 TeV tonight by Jake Lee</title>
		<link>http://alexslover.com/2010/03/30/lhc-to-start-colliding-at-7-tev-tonight/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexslover.com/?p=127#comment-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the Clarkson. &quot;POWEEERRRRRRR!!!!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Clarkson. &#8220;POWEEERRRRRRR!!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

